The Power of Evaluation: Transforming Teaching and Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v2i1.582Keywords:
evaluation, educational process. formative and summative assessments, technological integration, and reflective practicesAbstract
Evaluation is a fundamental component of the educational process, essential for measuring and improving student learning. This study explores the multifaceted role of evaluation, emphasizing formative and summative assessments, technological integration, and reflective practices. Formative assessments offer real-time feedback, allowing educators to adapt instruction and address learning gaps, while summative assessments provide a comprehensive overview of student achievements at the end of instructional periods. The integration of technology into evaluation practices enhances data collection and analysis, supports personalized learning experiences, and introduces diverse assessment methods. Reflective practices foster continuous improvement by helping students and educators set goals, develop strategies, and refine performance. Ensuring fairness and inclusivity in evaluations promotes equity and supports diverse learner needs. Utilizing a library research design, this study systematically collects, evaluates, and synthesizes academic sources to provide a comprehensive understanding of these evaluation components. The findings highlight the need for a balanced approach that combines formative and summative assessments, leverages technology, and incorporates reflective practices to improve student outcomes and overall educational quality.
References
Barrett, H. C. (2010). Balancing the two faces of e-portfolios: A research agenda. In M. K. Reedy & E. R. Vickers (Eds.), Assessing and improving student learning in higher education (pp. 159-176). Routledge.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(4), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2335-2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
Harlen, W., & James, M. (2020). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(3), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594970040304
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Redecker, C. (2017). Changing assessment—Towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 52(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12018
Shute, V. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2014). Formative and summative assessment: A framework for assessment practice. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.939529
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Questions worth considering. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1098
